A global coalition working to make broadband affordable for all

Source: A4AI

Download data
i Indicator info
by wesCountry
Click on a country to view more data
by wesCountry100500MalaysiaColombiaCosta RicaPeruArgentinaThailandTurkeyMexicoMoroccoIndiaDominican Rep.IndonesiaBotswanaJordanBrazilEcuadorJamaicaMauritiusNigeriaPakistanFijiViet NamGhanaSenegalCôte d'IvoireTunisiaSouth AfricaCambodiaBeninUgandaKenyaRwandaChinaEgyptMaliMyanmarNepalTanzaniaKazakhstanAlgeriaPhilippinesHondurasBoliviaGambiaSri LankaBangladeshCameroonZambiaPapua New GuineaBurkina FasoMozambiqueEl SalvadorNamibiaMalawiMadagascarAngolaVenezuelaZimbabweLaosNigerGuatemalaAfghanistanSudanNicaraguaLiberiaBurundiSierra LeoneBelizeEthiopiaHaitiCongo, DRYemen

High-Scoring     Low-Scoring

Sign up for to have affordability news delivered to your inbox.

©2008-2022 Alliance for Affordable Internet. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
Close Indicator info
Code Description
Affordability Drivers Index
TypeCodeAccess Sub-index IndicatorsSource
PrimaryA5Clear, time-bound targets in National Broadband Plan for reducing cost & increasing penetrationA4AI
PrimaryA12USAFs used to subsidise access for underserved and underprivileged populationsA4AI
PrimaryA4ICT regulatory decisions informed by adequate evidenceA4AI
PrimaryA13Specific policies to promote free or low-cost accessA4AI
PrimaryA11To what extent have Universal Access/Service Funds (USF) prioritised infrastructure investments that will reduce costs and increase access for underserved communities and market segments?A4AI
PrimaryA2To what extent does the gov’t ICT regulator perform its functions according to published and transparent rules, with the ICT regulatory decisions influenced by public consultations?A4AI
PrimaryA14To what extent do the country’s broadband policies include strategies and programs to improve access and use among women and girls.A4AI
SecondaryWIMarket Concentration, as Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) *GSMA Intelligence
SecondaryITU_KExistence of National Broadband PlanITU ICT-EYE
SecondaryWI_CMobile broadband connections (% of all connections) *GSMA Intelligence
SecondaryITU_EYECluster of ITU indicators (bundled)ITU ICT-EYE
SecondaryITU_NPercentage of individuals using the InternetITU WTID
SecondaryMobile_penetMarket penetration, as mobile internet unique subscribers *GSMA Intelligence
SecondarySmart_PhadptSmartphone adoption *GSMA Intelligence
TypeCodeInfrastructure Sub-index IndicatorsSource
PrimaryA1Flexible, technology & service neutral ICT licensing frameworksA4AI
PrimaryA8Specific guidelines for public infrastructure funding & telecoms subsidiesA4AI
PrimaryA9Time bound gov’t plan to make available broadband spectrum for high-speed data servicesA4AI
PrimaryA10Transparent, competitive and fair process for increasing spectrum availabilityA4AI
PrimaryA3To what extent does the regulator and/or the competition commission enforce the country’s ICT licensing requirements and regulations?A4AI
PrimaryA6National policies in place facilitating efficient access to public rights of way & tower zoning permissionsA4AI
PrimaryA7To what extent does the government facilitate resource sharing across telecommunications operators?A4AI
SecondaryITU_AInternational bandwidth per Internet user (bits/s)A4AI
SecondaryITU_LInvestment per telecom subscriber (USD, millions)A4AI
SecondaryWB_ASecure Internet servers (per 1 million people)World Bank Open Data
SecondaryWB_EAccess to Electricity (2020) †World Bank Open Data
SecondaryIEAAElectrification Rate (2018 and 2019) †IEA Data
SecondaryPCHExistence of Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)PCH Internet Exchange Directory
SecondaryITU_PORExistence of Number portability between mobile network operatorsITU ICT-EYE
Secondary3G3G Network coverage, by population *GSMA Intelligence
* Some of the indicators in this table were used for the actual calculations of the index, but yet are not available in the data explorer because they come from a copyright protected database that requires a paid subscription to access.
† Different sources were used for this indicator on different years of analysis due to limited data availability, but a correlation analysis has been performed first to guarantee both could be considered equivalent.